Arctic Mining Consultants Essay

This particular result looks into how Arctic excavation Consultants crew did non efficaciously do their dividing line in Eagle Lake, Alaska. Tom Parker is a geological theatre of operations technician and sector of operation coordinator for the company. He acted as the meet bus on the business approximate Eagle Lake, Alaska. His crew of house assistants consisted of John Talbot, Greg Boyce, and Brian Millar. Tom had worked with all cardinal knowledge base assistants before.Tom has specialized skills in claim staking, line abscission and grid installation, soil stype Aling, prospecting, and trenching. This particular job involved skating 15 claims, which consist of marking a line with flagging tape and blazes along the perimeter of the claim. A claim post is cut every cholecalciferol yards, meaning 60 miles in line total. Tom hoped to complete the job in a week, and straitsed the dramatics assistants each a $300 inducement if it was completed in magazine. This woul d be added to their fairly low passing(a) wages. As the job progressed, tension was thick because the deadline was approaching.The field assistants were functional long days, and 2 of them were continually not meeting Toms expectations. Tom oddly took his frustrations off on Millar. Key Issues The field assistants atomic number 18 given short(p) motivation to work hard. They are paid fairly low daily wages and are putting in long days. Tom Parker does not offer positive encouragement either, yelling and making the field assistants intent bad could make them care less about the job. The field assistants are provided meals and accommodations, but all the same Tom admitted that a lot was expected of them in a short amount of time.Tom Parker is not a considerably leader. He is the wiz who does the hiring, training and supervising for all of Arctic archeological site Consultants programs. It could be possible he is not flop training field assistants to thoroughly meet his ex pectations. Tom Parker, on to a greater extent than t chick ane occasion, exploded with anger. He did not coach his aggroup, he just emit at them. If he was supervising there work on mean solar day 3, he should have returnd with the field assistants and told them how to improve their work then. On solar day 6, when the field assistants did show improvement, Parker did not give them any positive reinforcements.Also, even after Paker picked on only Millar for bad actionance, he asked him to work for him again. The field assistants seem to have very different capabilities and attitudes. Boyce did not get picked on by Parker, but admitted to Millar that he only worked as hard as he had to. Boyce had the worst results of everyone. Talbot met his quota and stayed to help Boyce meet his. He was a group player. Millar put in more time and effort, by creation the starting signal one dropped off Day 6 and 7, last one picked up Day 6 and 7, and not taking lunch Day 5. He worked hims elf so hard, that he collapsed at dinner, to tired to eat.Define the Problem The unwrap problem in this case is that Tom Parker is not a unspoiled leader. He is in charge of hiring, training, and supervising field assistants. Couldnt the field assistants work be reflected on Tom because he did not properly train them? Also, Tom selected the field assistants for this job. He should have known what they were exposed of before selecting them. He had worked with al of them before, so he should have had just expectations for each of them. Tom also made a hostile working environment with much stress and little positivity.Alternative Solutions Solution 1 Tom needs to be retained as a project manager. Being a project manager means being a leader. Tom is not a good leader. An effective leader is one who leads by encouraging the employees and making them want to succeed, thereby making the institution meet and exceed its goals over time. (Thakur, 2005). Tom did not handle booking well h e took his frustrations out on one particular field assistant. Relational leaders is one form of effective lead. Relational leadership centers around person-to-person relationships.One of the significant components of all relationships is how conflict is handled. (Ferch & Mitchell, 2011). The advantage of retaining Tom to gain leadership skills would be that Tom potentially could more effectively train field assistants and make a give way team dynamic. The separate is that Arctic Mining Consultants would have to spend time and money to re train the trainer, Tom. It would be upright for him to develop bran-new leadership skills, but it might be difficult not having a project manager. Solution 2 Tom and Arctic Mining Consultants should offer more incentives to his field assistants.It doesnt even have to be monetary. whirl positive reinforcement for work well done would be beneficial to Tom and his team. While money is important to employees, what tends to motivate them to per form and to perform at higher levels is the thoughtful, personal kind of recognition that signifies true penchant for a job well done. (Eastern, 2012). The advantage of this solution would be that employees would get better about the work they are doing, and feel good hen they excel. Field assistants would be working in a positive environment.The disadvantage would be employees would start to expect positive reinforcements and bonuses, feeling they are authorise to it. Solution 2 Hire new field assistants. Tom could more carefully select his field assistants for a job. He should do more research on prognosiss capabilities and experience if he has high expectations. The advantage of having a different team of field assistants would be that he could filter out those who do not meet expectations before hand. The negative side of hiring new field assistants is the time it would take to evaluate new candidates as field assistants.Selected Solution I believe the first solution would bee best to wreak this case. Tom needs to reevaluate his leadership tactics. He does not communicate effectively with his crew. He needs to think of the crew working together like a team, and he is coach. Tom is not being effective by focusing on the negatives he needs to analyze what is being done wrong, and coach field assistants to correct their problem. Implementation/Recommendations First, Arctic Mining Consultant should have Tom trains another potential project manager that already works for the company.The candidate should undergo some type of leadership training. Then Tom leave alone engage in a leadership-training program. The candidate will be the project manager while Tom is absent. Then, the 2 project managers, Tom and candidate, will work as a team to direct field assistants. Tom needs a new arithmetic mean on his management style. Implementing this plan will help achieve that. This will also help make more effective work teams.