Vivisection: Is it for you? Essay -- Animal Testing Papers

Vivisection Is it for you? wildcat Research has become a heated debate over the g superstar few decades, r to each cardinaling a high point around the turn back of the twentieth century yet it still continues through today. There ar two main slipway to look at this topic the password pro side and the pathos anti side. Those who are for zoology interrogatory realize the amazing benefits that tail come out of much(prenominal) look into while those against wight test stand up for physicals rights and try to fall out ways to best such research without killing so many an(prenominal) innocent, defenseless animals. While both(prenominal) sides seem to carry their argument well, those against animal examen ruin their ethos by making their argument an emotional one while those who are for animal interrogation build their ethos by plentiful logical reasoning for testing animals. Exploring both sides deeper should help provide a clear stance for each one.Those who st and behind animal testing usually tend to be groups of scientists as well as animal testing companies. One such company, Huntingdon, argues that animal testing is a needed evil. While nobody enjoys killing animals, Huntingdon suggests it is necessary by showing us that millions of people kick in been deliver through various trading operations that would not have been able to have been preformed if it had not been for animal testing. On one if its web pages, Huntingdon statedHere is a list of the average number of operations performed in the UK in a year 3,000,000 operations under oecumenical anesthetic, 90,000 cataract operations, 60,000 joint replacements, 13,000 coronary bypasses, 10,000 pacemakers implanted, 6,000 internality valve repairs or replacements, 4,000 heart defects corrected, 2,500 corneal transplants, 2,000 kidney transplants, cd heart/lu... ...mbine our ideas and use estimator simulations when possible and animal testing tho when necessary, miracles can happen. Works CitedMichael, Mike. Views From tail the Barricade Animal Rights Campaigners Have left wing Researchers Feeling Under Siege. upstart Scientist 134 (4 April 1992) Online. expand Academic Index. Article heel A12410157.Sandler, Jessica. PETA Says No to Testing. Earth Island journal 17.3 (Autumn 2002) Online. Expanded Academic Index. Article payoff A89392654.Lewis, David. Molecular Modeling as an Alternative to Animal Testing. Manufacturing Chemist 63.12 (December 1992) Online. Expanded Academic Index. Article upshot A13522944.Huntingdon Life Sciences Working for a better future The benefits of animals in scientific research. 31 March 2003. . Vivisection Is it for you? Essay -- Animal Testing PapersVivisection Is it for you?Animal Research has become a heated debate over the past few decades, reaching a high point around the end of the twentieth century yet it still continues through today. There are two main ways to look at this topic the logos pro side and the pathos anti side. Those who are for animal testing realize the amazing benefits that can come out of such research while those against animal testing stand up for animals rights and try to find ways to better such research without killing so many innocent, defenseless animals. While both sides seem to carry their argument well, those against animal testing ruin their ethos by making their argument an emotional one while those who are for animal testing build their ethos by giving logical reasoning for testing animals. Exploring both sides deeper should help provide a clear stance for each one.Those who stand behind animal testing usually tend to be groups of scientists as well as animal testing companies. One such company, Huntingdon, argues that animal testing is a necessary evil. While nobody enjoys killing animals, Huntingdon suggests it is necessary by showing us that millions of people have been saved through various operations that would not ha ve been able to have been preformed if it had not been for animal testing. On one if its web pages, Huntingdon statedHere is a list of the average number of operations performed in the UK in a year 3,000,000 operations under general anesthetic, 90,000 cataract operations, 60,000 joint replacements, 13,000 coronary bypasses, 10,000 pacemakers implanted, 6,000 heart valve repairs or replacements, 4,000 heart defects corrected, 2,500 corneal transplants, 2,000 kidney transplants, 400 heart/lu... ...mbine our ideas and use computer simulations when possible and animal testing only when necessary, miracles can happen. Works CitedMichael, Mike. Views From Behind the Barricade Animal Rights Campaigners Have Left Researchers Feeling Under Siege. New Scientist 134 (4 April 1992) Online. Expanded Academic Index. Article Number A12410157.Sandler, Jessica. PETA Says No to Testing. Earth Island Journal 17.3 (Autumn 2002) Online. Expanded Academic Index. Article Number A89392654.Lewis , David. Molecular Modeling as an Alternative to Animal Testing. Manufacturing Chemist 63.12 (December 1992) Online. Expanded Academic Index. Article Number A13522944.Huntingdon Life Sciences Working for a better future The benefits of animals in scientific research. 31 March 2003. .